Rohana, Rohana (2025) Gender Perspective in Discourse Marker Analysis on BBC Learning English Podcast. Skripsi, Tarbiyah dan Keguruan.
![]() |
Text
PERNYATAAN.pdf Download (265kB) |
![]() |
Text
AWAL.pdf Download (697kB) |
![]() |
Text
ABSTRACT.pdf Download (265kB) |
![]() |
Text
BAB I.pdf Download (482kB) |
![]() |
Text
BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (522kB) |
![]() |
Text
BAB III.pdf Download (437kB) |
![]() |
Text
BAB IV.pdf Download (587kB) |
![]() |
Text
BAB V.pdf Download (319kB) |
![]() |
Text
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (305kB) |
![]() |
Text
LAMPIRAN.pdf Download (2MB) |
ABSTRAK
This study examined the type and function of discourse markers used by both women and men podcasters in 15 selected episodes of the BBC Learning English Podcast, applying Schiffrin's theory. The research aimed to identify types and function of discourse markers used and analyzed differences gender in used discourse marker by women and men on BBC Learning English Through content analysis of the podcast transcripts, a total of 651 discourse markers were identified and categorized. The findings aligned with Schiffrin's theory, encompassed six categories of discourse markers: Information Management, Response, Connectives, Cause and Result, Temporal Adverbs, and Information and Participation. The discourse marker and was the most frequently used by both genders (women: 117, men: 149). Men used discourse markers more often overall (total 336) compared to women (total 315). The primary function of discourse markers most frequently conveyed by both genders was connecting ideas, clauses, or sentences, especially to link similar ideas during podcast conversations. Other common functions included introducing, shifting, or returning to a topic; acknowledging or reacting to previous utterances; showing causal relationships; and indicating the temporal order of events and marking the transition of the relevance of the information state. Gender differences in discourse marker use aligned with Tannen's (1990) theory. Women utilized these to foster rapport and offer proposals, while men used them to emphasize status and structure factual information. Women used but for compromise and men used it for direct correction. These findings highlight how subtle linguistic choices reflect gendered communication patterns
Item Type: | Skripsi |
---|---|
Subjects: | L Education > L Education (General) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan > Tadris Bahasa Inggris |
Depositing User: | Yoe Oden |
Date Deposited: | 25 Jul 2025 08:30 |
Last Modified: | 25 Jul 2025 08:30 |
URI: | http://idr.uin-antasari.ac.id/id/eprint/29794 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |