Syarkani, Muhammad (2013) The Fifth Semester Students’ Active Listening in Speaking III of English Department of Tarbiyah Faculty of IAIN Antasari Banjarmasin Academic Year 2012/2013. Skripsi, Tarbiyah dan Keguruan.

Preview	Text CHAPTER I.pdf Download (336kB) | Preview
Preview	Text CHAPTER IV.pdf Download (279kB) | Preview

ABSTRAK

Muhammad Syarkani, 2013. The Fifth Semester Students’ Active Listening in Speaking III of English Department of Tarbiyah Faculty of IAIN Antasari Banjarmasin Academic Year 2012/2013. Advisors: (1) Dra. Hj. Wardah Hayati, MA and (2) Hj. Noor Maulidiyah, MA. This research is based on the reasons that every students of English department must take speaking subject in 3 semesters. They must practice the speaking skills well with conversation in pairs, individual presentation, role plays, group presentation and other. Another reason is active listening must relate with speaking skills. Someone can communicate well in speaking if they are good in listening too. Then to become good speakers, people have to be good listeners. The statement of problem in this research is how is the fifth semester students’ active listening in speaking III subject at English department of Tarbiyah Faculty of IAIN Antasari Banjarmasin academic year 2012/2013? The population of the research is the fifth semester students at English department in academic year 2012/2013. There are three classes of the fifth semester; class A, B, and C. The writer takes 30 students (28%) from 105 populations as the sample of this research. They are 10 students from each class. The data of this research are collected through observation, questionnaire, and documentary. All the data are analyzed by using descriptive qualitative analysis. It processed through editing, coding, tabulating, and data interpretation. The result of this research shows that the fifth semester students’ active listening in Speaking III at English Department of Tarbiyah Faculty of IAIN Antasari Banjarmasin academic year 2012/2013 is in good active listening category, but they could improve. The total score is 2016 of 30 students with the Mean score 67.2.

Actions (login required)

View Item