This research is motivated by the decision of the Ministry of Religion of the
Republic of Indonesia through the Lajnah Pentashih Mushaf Al-Quran (LPMQ) that
every verse of Al-Quran printed or in the form of media must be followed the pattern
of writing the Indonesian Standard Mushaf (ISM) which is the application of Rasm
'Utsmâniy- has been certified by LPMQ itself. In this case, the writer found a book that
was not include the sign of the tashih, namely the Book of Al-Imdâd Fî Awrâd Ahli Al-
Widâd. In this study, the author proposes two problem formulations, first, about the
application of Rasm 'Uthmânîy in the Indonesian Standard Manuscript and the Book of
Al-lmdâd Fî Awrâd Ahli Al-Widâd Writing, second, the differences between the
Indonesian Standard Mushaf and The Book of Al-lmdâd Fî Awrad Ahli Al-Widad
Writing. There are two objectives in this research, first, to describe the application of
Rasm 'Utsmâniy in Indonesian Standard Islamic Mushaf and The Book of Al-lmdâd Fî
Awrâd Ahli Al-Widâd, second, to know the similarities and difference between the
Indonesian Standard manuscript and Al-lmdâd Fî Awrâd Ahli Al-Widâd Writing.
In this study, the author uses a comparative method (comparison), to compare
between the Indonesian Standard Manuscript and the The Book of Al-Imdâd Fî Awrâd
Ahli Al-Widâd and to find the difference in the writing pattern of Rasm 'Uthmânîy.
After doing a further comparison between the Indonesian Standard manuscript
and The Book of Al-Imdâd Fî Awrâd Ahli Al-Widâd, the author found several facts,
several facts are the Al-lmdâd writing, PT. Al-Zahra formed a group of five people who
understand graphic design and Arabic rules. Furthermore, the author found that there
were several words in Al-Imdâd which the writing did not follow ISM. Initially, the
author thought that these different words might follow other narrations, but after
examining, its turn out that the writing form used did not follow the opinion of Imam
Ad-Dânîy or Abu Dawud.