Masitah, Masitah (2019) Communication Strategies Used by Students with Different Communication Apprehension Levels at English Education Department of UIN Antasari Banjarmasin. Skripsi, Tarbiyah dan Keguruan.

	Text PERNYATAAN.pdf Download (156kB)
	Text ABSTRAK.pdf Download (213kB)
	Text AWAL.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text BAB I.pdf Download (226kB)
	Text BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (186kB)
	Text BAB III.pdf Download (101kB)
	Text BAB IV.pdf Download (376kB)
	Text BAB V.pdf Download (127kB)
	Text DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (222kB)

ABSTRAK

ABSTRACT Masitah. 2019. Communication Strategies Used by Students with Different Communication Apprehension Levels at English Education Department of UIN Antasari Banjarmasin. Thesis. English Education Department, Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Antasari State Islamic University Banjarmasin. Advisor: (I) Nani Hizriani, MA, (II) Hidayah Nor, S.Pd, M.Pd. Keywords: Communication Strategies, Communication Apprehension Levels Communication strategy was needed for EFL students in order to help them improve their quality of speaking performance. It is believed that students who have low of C.A used many communication strategies and as for the students who have high level of C.A were rarely used communication strategies while speaking used the foreign language. They were 13 types of communication strategies delivered by Dornyei used by the researcher in this research, they are: message abandonment, topic avoidance, circumlocution, approximation, use of all-purposes words, word coinage, prefabricated patterns, use of nonlinguistic means, literal translation, Foreignizing, code switching, appeal for help and use of fillers/hesitation devices. Thus, the researcher was interested to conduct a research about students communication strategies with different communication apprehension levels and found the result differently. The researcher applied descriptive qualitative analysis to conduct this research and the result of this research are:(1) “Message abandonment”, “Topic avoidance”, “Approximation”, “Use of all-purpose words”, ”words coinage”, “Prefabricated patterns”, “ Use of nonlinguistic means”, “Literal translation”, “Foreignizing”, “Code switching”, “Appeal for help”, and “ Use of fillers/ hesitation devices. (2) for the high level of communication apprehension students, the highly used communication strategy was “Use of fillers/ hesitation devices” and for the lowly used was “Word coinage” and “Use of nonlinguistic means” for the low level of communication apprehension students, the highly used communication strategy was “Use of fillers/ hesitation devices” and for the lowly used was “Prefabricated patterns”. (3) the level of communication apprehension students who used communication strategy the most was students with high level of communication apprehension. therefore, both level of students used many types of communication strategies regardless their level of communication apprehension.

Actions (login required)

View Item