Musdalifah, Musdalifah (2023) Evaluation Technique Used by the Supervisors in Assessing Pre-Service Teacher in the Fifth Semester Students of Antasari State Islamic University Banjarmasin. Skripsi, Tarbiyah dan Keguruan.

	Text PERNYATAAN.pdf Download (275kB)
	Text AWAL.pdf Download (1MB)
	Text ABSTRAK.pdf Download (320kB)
	Text BAB I.pdf Download (723kB)
	Text BAB II.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (496kB)
	Text BAB III.pdf Download (215kB)
	Text BAB IV.pdf Download (470kB)
	Text BAB V.pdf Download (318kB)
	Text DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf Download (209kB)
	Text LAMPIRAN.pdf Download (1MB)

ABSTRAK

Evaluation can be delivered in different technique. There are some supervisors who have different technique in evaluate their student teacher in order to assess their teaching performance in teaching English. this technique choosed by the supervisors as an alternative to make their student teacher good in teaching performance because they have to teach in real EFL classroom after they finish their pre-service teacher trainee. This research is conducted by using a descriptive qualitative method, with the technique Questionnaire and Interview. The data used is English language institution Tarbiyah and Teachers Training Faculty UIN Antasari Banjarmasin class of 2019 and 2020. Within the 11 students who give the feedback. The totals of questionnaire are 8 and interview questions are 6. The results of this study showed that techniques used by supervisors to assess their student teacher teaching performance are: Classroom observation, peer-evaluation, peer-coaching, and portfolios. The way how the supervisor evaluation technique as follow: classroom observation by giving right after the project or product presented by the presenter. Peer evaluation by make a feedback with one with friends in the class. Peer-coaching by ask other professionalism to help the supervisor in class. Portfolios by review or observe or evaluate after several presentation. The strength of the techniques used by supervisors’ evaluation given is effective, detailed and accurate. The weakness of the evaluation given are no specific example, took a long time, repeating and too short.

Actions (login required)

View Item